online at
twitter
Tumblr
LinkedIn
BlipFM
Vimeo
yelp
facebook

Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Day 1 at SXSWi – UX panels + Mark Cuban rips.
Friday, March 12th, 2010

My first day back at SXSW Interactive is in the books. My day started with the UX of Mobile panel. It was okay. There were some good insights into new developments at Google and some observations regarding different user behavior when using Maps on mobile devices. Beyond that, there was little practical advice. I was hoping to get some good ideas and examples of existing and potential design patterns. Instead, we received little beyond the consensus that there is a bright future for mobile devices.

After that, I attended a panel with a couple of Google UX’s called Long Distance UX. Like many, I walked out early because there was little of value provided beyond the obvious. I’ve been doing remote UX work for a couple of years now and discovered no new insights. At times, the panel didn’t explain itself well or made statements that appeared to border on the ridiculous. With both the first panels, I thought the topics where covered with too broad a brush and some more practical examples might have been more useful.

My day ended at the Battle for Your TV panel where sparks flew. This was a blood bath that pitted Mark Cuban (HDNet / Dallas Mavs) versus Avner Ronen (Boxee). Here’s a hint, Cuban barely blinked, much less bleed.



http://www.flickr.com/photos/swnktstic/

I think Cuban stunned Ronen right out by attacking Boxee on the lack of a revenue model. In turn, Ronen attempted to attack Cuban on Broadcast.com. These efforts failed miserably. Questions about Broadcast.com were met with responses like,

(Broadcast.com) made more money in a quarter than any revenue ever made by Boxee.

(Broadcast.com) was going to go cash flow positive the quarter Yahoo decided to buy the company.

Ronen had no answers. This first rampage by Cuban was slowed only by the fire alarm that forced the evacuation of the convention center. When conversation reconvened, Cuban picked up where he left off. During a Q & A section, there was a long line of angry, rambling attendees ready to take on Cuban. He quickly dismissed all challenges, sometimes with funny responses. Mark Cuban is just plain whip smart.

Like others, I came into the room leaning towards Boxee. I wanted to believe. I came out totally convinced by Mark Cuban. He spoke intelligently about revenue models and why distribution systems other than the Internet made more financial sense. He also made it abundantly clear that he was platform agnostic in that he simply looked for good return on his investment. If distribution via web video providers would provide adequate guarantees, he would be happy to work deals. Cuban demonstrated great knowledge of the domain while Ronen, sadly, looked lost. It saddens me to say this, but I think Ronen may have hurt Boxee more than he helped here. I have a hard time seeing the long term viability of the company after listening to their chief executive. I also came out with a whole new level of respect for Mark Cuban.

Overall, my first day was positive. The Mark Cuban panel was as exciting as any i’ve seen at any conference. I also had a great time chatting with very interesting, intelligent people about topics on which I am passionate. I can’t wait until tomorrow.

What husbands and wives search for on Google compared to boyfriends and girlfriends
Monday, January 11th, 2010

There is an interesting post at Predictably Irrational on leveraging Google’s auto-suggest functionality to gain insights into what people care about regarding particular subjects.

The post explored leveraging the searches of other users to gain insight into what boyfriends and girlfriends might care about most. I figured i’d take it a step further and perform the same experiment for married people, contrasting it to those of the original experiment. I threw the results into a grid for a little more insight. Here it is …

how-can-i-get-my

Web 2.0 Expo: Next Generation of Browsers
Monday, April 6th, 2009

Today was an interesting day of at Web 2.0 Expo. There were 2 sessions in particular that caught my attention because they clearly mark the next step in the transition from the desktop to the “cloud.” One of these sessions was the Chrome Developer Session by Ojan Vanfai, one of the project engineers from Google. Given the affirmation that ”Google’s main hope (being) to see web applications succeed,” they have built a new javascript engine for the browser called V8. The engine is open source, as is a version of the product called Chromium; I think this will go a long way to addressing privacy concerns by providing transparency to the product. Chrome uses the web-kit rendering engine also used by Safari. The product also comes with WebKit Developer Tools, think Firebug. Both Mac and Linux versions of the product were in development.

The other really interesting session was that by Pete LePage from Microsoft’s IE8 team; there’s a pdf copy of the presentation slides available. Like Chrome, IE8 seems also poised to provide a platform for web based applications. While this was not explicitly stated, it was clearly evident from the presentation. IE8 includes native support for JSON. They too have also built a Web Developer tool very reminiscent to Firebug. IE8 has a new rendering engine which is much more standards compliant …. yeeeeaaaay! It has a button that allows users to switch between the IE7 and IE8 rendering engines. Pete mentioned this was meant to be easy so that “your mom” could do it. Personally, I think this is a stretch. He implored designers and developers to test their websites as there are Pete did a great job of sidestepping the all too common complaints regarding rendering engine issues pertaining to standards.

Experience Review: Cuil: Missed Opportunity
Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

Like many people yesterday, I was excited to check out the well funded, new search engine from the former Googlers. Cuil was supposed to be the challenger to Google’s search throne. Their launch yesterday was more about a company missing an opportunity. They received a fair amount of press, which not only got me to visit their site but also a fair amount of my less technically inclined friends. 

While they claim to have a largest index, the results are anything but good. Cuil … it’s not the size of your index, but the quality of the results. Cuil fails miserably exactly where it was most likely to engage new users. They seem to have failed to ask themselves a most basic question,

What are user’s likely to search for when using a new search engine?

People search for themselves or for something they know. The whole idea of Google-ing yourself is obviously not a new one. Whether to satisfy a curiosity or for privacy purposes, few have not broken down and indulged in this bit of quasi-ego-maniacal activity. It’s an exciting activity that is often revealing and usually in an unexpected way. Cuil totally misses the boat. 

Searches performed for the names of a couple of people I know provided absolutely no results. These same names in Google and Yahoo provide a hearty amount of results, as these are people who regularly blog. In addition, a search for my company’s name provided results that we were anything but focused. Google and Yahoo provide much more focused, quality results.

If Cuil is to really make a challenge, they sure got off to a really bad start. They totally missed on a wonderful opportunity to make a great impression on the most significant amount of traffic they were likely to receive for free. In addition, they garnered a whole bunch of bad reviews, which will make their goal of overtaking Google all the more difficult.